Ryota Tanuma vs Seongbin Sim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 03:34 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tanuma vs S. Sim

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tanuma 1 - 0 Sim
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ryota Tanuma winning 2 and Seongbin Sim winning 0. The last match between Ryota Tanuma and Seongbin Sim was at the M15 Yanagawa City, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ryota Tanuma getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tanuma | 1 |
| Sim | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Yanagawa City(10-29-25)
R. Tanuma vs S. Sim H2H Profile
R. Tanuma vs S. Sim Match Preview:
- Ryota Tanuma has a slight edge in recent second serve performance, winning 43.70% of points compared to Seongbin Sim’s 41.64%. Which player might capitalize better on their opponent's weakness here? Ryota Tanuma seems to have the upper hand.
- In terms of return performance, Seongbin Sim excels on opponents' second serves with a success rate of 47.50%, while Ryota Tanuma achieves 45.86%. On first serve returns, Ryota shows strength with 28.83% compared to Seongbin’s 24.36%.
- How do both players handle pressure situations like breakpoints? Ryota proves more resilient, saving 54.33% of breakpoints versus Seongbin’s 50.93%.
- Analyzing match outcomes over the past year, Ryota boasts a higher win percentage of 64.29%, whereas Seongbin holds a 57.69% success rate in matches played.
- Both players are particularly strong on hard surfaces, each with a career win rate of 59%. Their least favorable surface is grass, where both have won 33% of their matches.
- Both have primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments in the last year, with Ryota winning 64.29% of his matches and Seongbin 57.69%.
- Ryota has faced stronger competition, playing opponents ranked an average of 247.18 compared to Seongbin’s 333.54 over the last 12 months.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Seongbin shows strength with a 57% win rate, superior to Ryota’s 44% record.
- Current event dynamics also factor into predictions, but general historical trends provide useful forecasts, indicating disparities in performance contextually.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the overall capabilities and current performances of Ryota Tanuma and Seongbin Sim, several key factors stand out. Ryota Tanuma demonstrates stronger second serve performance and more effective breakpoint saving abilities, which often translate into critical points within the match.
Seongbin Sim’s capacity to win deciding sets could play a pivotal role if the match becomes a close contest. However, Ryota’s experience against higher-ranked opponents and his efficient return game, particularly against the first serve, give him a considerable edge.
Considering these elements, Ryota Tanuma appears to be the likely victor in this match, leveraging his strengths in serve and return to edge out his competitor.
Ryota Tanuma vs Seongbin Sim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Tanuma vs S. Sim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:17:8 | Average Match Time | 1:17:8 |
| 59% (29/49) | 1st Serve % | 55% (36/66) |
| 72% (21/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (18/36) |
| 50% (10/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (33/66) | Return Points Win % | 37% (18/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Tanuma Recent Matches Played
S. Sim Recent Matches Played

R. Tanuma vs S. Sim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.49% (311/230) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.58% (95/70) |
| 56.36% (682/528) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.37% (214/159) |
| 53.52% (5856/5085) | Games Win/Loss | 52.36% (1864/1696) |
| 58.46% (228/162) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.08% (65/53) |
| 56.20% (68/53) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 51.85% (14/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.43% (20/8) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1058 | Aces Total | 324 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 941 | Total Double Faults | 267 |
| 1:6:43 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 452.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 243.61 |
| 61% (14086/23227) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3137/5232) |
| 67% (9450/14086) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2090/3137) |
| 50% (4606/9142) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1025/2095) |
| 43% (1048/2443) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (224/530) |
| 40% (9514/23541) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2069/5161) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 35.48% (11/20) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 58.94% (300/209) | Futures W/L | 57.76% (93/68) |
| 57% (306/533) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (94/162) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (56/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (23/37) |
| 53% (68/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (20/44) |
| 89% (313/280) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (96/86) |
| 11% (313/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (96/10) |
| 14% (228/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (69/9) |